Local News

Project funding request list back to Assembly

The Ketchikan Gateway Borough Assembly meets in regular session Monday evening. On the agenda yet again is the community project priority list.

The list of projects that the community hopes will receive state grant funding has been a contentious topic of discussion for more than a month. It was approved by a committee of representatives from the borough, the City of Saxman and the City of Ketchikan, and then was approved again by the Borough Assembly and the Saxman City Council.

The Ketchikan City Council, however, rejected the list because a majority of Council members felt that the city’s bridge replacement project should be higher up on the prioritized list.

The issue went back and forth several times, and on Friday, the committee met again and approved a non-prioritized list of projects. The City Council accepted that new list in a special meeting on Monday, but since then, Council Member Sam Bergeron asked for reconsideration of that action.

The Council won’t take up the issue again until its regular meeting on Thursday.

The Borough Assembly on Monday will review the non-prioritized list. Borough Manager Dan Bockhorst recommends approving it. That way, if the Council doesn’t change its vote on Thursday, the list can be submitted to the governor’s office Friday.

The Assembly meeting starts at 5:30 p.m. Monday in Borough Assembly chambers. A time for public comment is at the start of the meeting.

Recent News

Brotherhood, Sisterhood prepare for convention

Alaska Native Sisterhood members march in Wrangell during the Grand Camp's 2015 Convention in Wrangell. (Photo courtesy Peter Naoroz/ANB)
Alaska’s oldest Native organizations are trying to attract younger members. That and other issues are on the table at the ANB-ANS Grand Camp Convention Oct. 5-8. more

Home-rule process would cost up to $50,000

Ketchikan Gateway Borough offices are in the White Cliff building.
The process to create a home-rule charter for the Ketchikan Gateway Borough would be more expensive than just the $16,000 special election. more